With these designs, no efficiency is lost by including simple first-order carryover effects in the statistical model. However, if the possibility of carryover effects is to be considered in the statistical analysis of BE studies, the possibility of direct-by-carryover interaction should also be considered. If direct-by-carryover interaction is present in the statistical model, these favored designs are no longer optimal. Indeed, the TRR/RTT design does not permit an unbiased within-subject estimate of /j,t — Mr in the presence of general direct-by-carryover interaction.

The issue of whether a purely main effects model or a more saturated model should be specified, as described in the previous section, also is affected by possible carryover effects. If carryover effects, including direct-by-carryover interaction, are included in the statistical model, these effects will be partially confounded with sequence-by-treatment interaction in four-sequence or six-sequence replicated crossover designs, but not in two-sequence designs.

In the case of the four-period and three-period designs recommended in Section V.A.1, the estimate of /j,t — Mr, adjusted for first-order carryover effects including direct-by-carryover interaction, is as efficient or more efficient than for any other two-treatment replicated crossover designs.

For the majority of drug products, two-period replicated crossover designs such as the Balaam design (which uses the sequences TR, RT, TT, and RR) should be avoided for individual BE because subjects in the TT or RR sequence do not provide any information on SFI. However, the Balaam design may be useful for particular drug products (e.g., a long half-life drug for which a two-period study would be feasible but a three- or more period studies would not).

Outlier data in BE studies are defined as subject data for one or more BA measures that are discordant with corresponding data for that subject and/or for the rest of the subjects in a study. Because BE studies are usually carried out as crossover studies, the most important type of subject outlier is the within-subject outlier, where one subject or a few subjects differ notably from the rest of the subjects with respect to a within-subject T-R comparison. The existence of a subject outlier with no protocol violations could indicate one of the following situations.

Product failure could occur, for example, when a subject exhibits an unusually high or low response to one or the other of the products because of a problem with the specific dosage unit administered. This could occur, for example, with a sustained and/or delayed release dosage form exhibiting dose dumping or a dosage unit with a coating that inhibits dissolution.

An SFI could occur when an individual is representative of subjects present in the general population in low numbers, for whom the relative BA of the two products is markedly different than for the majority of the population, and for whom the two products are not bioequivalent, even though they might be bioequivalent in the majority of the population.

In the case of product failure, the unusual response could be present for either the Tor R product. However, in the case of a subpopulation, even if the unusual response is observed on the R product, there could still be concern for lack of interchangeability of the two products. For these reasons, deletion of outlier values is generally discouraged, particularly for nonreplicated designs. With replicated crossover designs, the retest character of these designs should indicate whether to delete an outlier value or not. Sponsors or applicants with these types of datasets may wish to review how to handle outliers with appropriate review staff.

The mixed-scaling approach has a discontinuity at the changeover point, erWo (IBC) or crTo (PBC), from constant to reference scaling. For example, if the estimate of the within-subject standard deviation of the reference is just above the changeover point, the confidence interval will be wider than just below. In this context, the confidence interval could pass the predetermined BE limit if the estimate is just below the boundary and could fail if just above. This guidance recommends that sponsors applying the individual BE approach may use either reference scaling or constant scaling at either side of the changeover point.

Was this article helpful?

## Post a comment